Ratha (papertygre) wrote,

Reposted from a comment: absence vs. negation

[In response to a suggestion that negatives are required to have positives, as shadows give dimension to light]

Hmm, well: are shadows an _absence_ of light, or are they a _negation_ of light?

The question I find myself asking is, would positive emotions still be as rewarding if they could only be contrasted to the absence of emotion, or do they really require negative emotions to be brought into full relief? Because there are two kinds of polarity. Maybe absence of emotion provides enough contrast.

Of course, risk of loss is necessary to get the greatest gains. But maybe risks can be hedged if one is sophisticated enough?
Tags: heuristics, principle
  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded