Ratha (papertygre) wrote,

World Underpopulation Problem

Some statistics suggesting that the Earth’s population might not continue to increase indefinitely.

I’m not sure how reliable this information (referenced by the thread) is, but it is interesting:

The 2050 projection has gone from the 1994 estimate of 9.8 billion to this year’s [1998] estimate of 8.9 billion.

Over the past 30 years, the average number of children born to women in the less-developed countries has fallen from 6.2 to 3.0—a decline of record-breaking speed.

Although a fertility rate of 2.1 children per woman is needed just to replace current population, in Europe the fertility rate has dropped to 1.42 and in Japan to 1.43.

This would support the idea that increasing quality of life will eventually rein in global population growth.

(via Marginal Revolution)

Edit: NYT article: “Demographic ‘Bomb’ May Only Go ‘Pop!’”

More surviving children means less incentive to give birth as often. As late as 1970, the world’s median fertility level was 5.4 births per woman; in 2000, it was 2.9. Barring war, famine, epidemic or disaster, a country needs a birthrate of 2.1 children per woman to hold steady.

Tags: culture, sustainability

  • A General Theory of Love

    A fascinating book by several professors of psychiatry about the science of human love and relationships. It was recommended by someone at the Zen…

  • Benevolent delusions

    I've been listening to a pretty good audiobook, " The One Thing You Need To Know." I've only heard the introduction, but that part included an…

  • Three links

    Buckets - featuring a funny picture in the vein of the cats Conjoined twins - short video documentary about high school age twins joined at the…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded