You are viewing [info]papertygre's journal

This should explain everything.

At least, in theory.
Previous 10 }
 
dragon from sinfest
 
papertygre
 
  

2011-07-27 13:40 | Emergent rigidity

In the early days of the web, someone got the idea that they should indicate the required fields of their form with a star. Somehow that convention got so entrenched that you now regularly see forms where practically every field has a star. Like this one: https://www.evernote.com/Registration.action. Personally, I think the default on paper forms is for people to assume a field is required, so it might have made more sense to mark the optional fields? And certainly nowadays, in a form like this Evernote registration, that would be better? But today the required-star is the rule, and I'm not sure if it's because the people who make the forms no longer think it's "right" without doing it that way, or if it's because they think users would be uncomfortable if it weren't that way, or maybe both.

A lot of Chinese and Indian restaurants have very uniform menus. With the exception of upscale or fusion type places, you can kind of expect to go into a Chinese restaurant and find Moo Shu Pork, Mongolian Beef, and General Tsao's Chicken. And you can expect Moo Shu to have cabbage in it and be served with a sweet sauce and thin pancakes. I'm sure traditional Chinese cuisine is as varied and nuanced as traditional American cuisine (when I went over to a friend's house as a kid, the American Chop Suey was always quite different than the way my mom made it). Yet, some early Chinese restaurant pioneers set up an original menu template, and ever since, there has been an expectation that new Chinese restaurants would follow that template. It's like the modern phenomenon of the chain restaurant -- which many people bemoan -- but, it happened organically. (Unless there is a secret Chinese restaurant bureau somewhere that coordinates it all.)

Five to ten years ago, I would get political solicitation letters in the mail and marvel that they were done up in a monospace typewriter font, with underlining and highlighting for emphasis. To me this was meant to suggest that the letter had been cobbled together in someone's basement on a typewriter, photocopied and highlighted by hand, and then mailed out; my interpretation was that this format was supposed to evoke the freshness and energy of a rebel underground, with cutting edge information disseminated through a critical network that you had been fortunate enough to get in on, and which needs your donation to survive! Yet, five or ten years ago, monospace typewriters were long dead and gone. In fact, these letters in the mail frequently had curly quotes and took advantage of boldface on their monospace text. So this anachronism had become a deliberate affect, but what was it trying to communicate anymore, except the fact that it was a political solicitation letter (because that was now the way political solicitation letters were supposed to look)? And today, I am still getting these types of letters... in email! People are making solicitation letters that look just like some grass roots memo from the 80's, and sending them in email. As far as I can tell, the only possible effect of using this format now is that people will not read it because they know from the font that it's a solicitation.
 
Autopilot is a powerful force.

---

I feel the need to add: SINKS. So often, bathroom sinks have these tiny little stubby faucets that you can barely get your hands under because you are running into the back of the sink basin. I once read, but can no longer find any references for, the idea that this was originally done because the main use case for sinks was to fill them up with water in order to wash your hair or your underwear or whatever. Thus, you didn't need to get under the faucet at all, and on the contrary, if the faucet were too big, you'd hit your head on it. Today, 95% of the time we just rinse stuff under the running faucet, so having a stubby little neck on it is just a nuisance, and if it were really an issue, we have the technology now to make the faucets rotate out of the way like they do in the kitchen!

 
dragon from sinfest
 
papertygre
 
  

2011-05-17 08:59 | Paperless

Someone explain to me why it'd be a bad idea to buy this duplex page-feed scanner which makes searchable PDFs, and this stack paper cutter which can cut off book bindings, and to scan all my books, magazines, receipts, and paper files.

I have about 500 books, none of which I can search, and all of which are large and heavy. This book-scanning service is kind of cool, but not economical, at ~$33 per 300-page book, or more like $36 with shipping. At that price, and with the above DIY equipment at $1039.98, the break-even point is about 30 books. If I factor in my time at $50/hr, and assume each book takes 15 minutes to strip, scan, and proof, the break-even point is more like 45 books. If I could do an average of 5 books a day, it would take about 3 months to scan them all. Hmm, maybe I could hire someone? At $5/book, labor for the entire project would cost $2500, which is probably the value of the whole library and therefore hard to justify, so I'd either do it myself or get rid of some of the books instead of scanning them. And honestly, part of the appeal is having a sheet-fed duplex scanner, so I don't have to have piles of paper around my desk. Ever. Again.

 
dragon from sinfest
 
papertygre
 
  

2011-05-14 14:42 | Colds

I get colds about twice a year. This is average, though to me it seems too often. It usually starts with a sore throat, moves into body aches and fatigue and coughing, and ends with congestion and runny nose.
 
In 2009, I read a bunch of information about the link between flu and Vitamin D, and started supplementing large amounts of vitamin D in the hope that this would decrease my frequency of illness. My vitamin D levels are now in the high-normal range, but my rate and severity of colds haven't changed.
 
It turns out that a significant number of people infected with colds do not get symptoms, and cold symptoms themselves play no part in recovering from the infection; moreover, most healthy people will get infected if rhinovirus is dropped in their nose[1], so getting a cold is not necessarily a sign of a weak immune system. The more meaningful question is therefore how to combat or prevent the symptoms.

From some cursory reading I pretty quickly ruled out vitamin C intake as well as vitamin D intake as factors. There are some resources that link cold incidence to decreased sleep / decreased quality of sleep or lack of regular exercise, but I find myself more convinced by the material implicating increased psychological stress, particularly chronic (> 1 month duration) stressors, because poor sleep can cause or be caused by stress, and exercise is a known stress mitigation technique.

Unfortunately, there doesn't appear to be an effective antihistamine treatment for cold symptoms -- only the older, drowsy-making antihistamines even work on cold symptoms, and they knock me out so they're not real options.

So perhaps the best approach would be prevention via a stress reduction campaign, such as regular meditation and exercise.

---

[1] "99% who entered the trial without antibody (titer of <= 2) to the virus to which they were exposed were infected, whereas 69% of those with antibody (titer of >= 4) This resulted in a total infection rate of 84%. 58% of those without antibody developed  colds, whereas only 19% of those with antibody developed colds. This resulted in a total of 40% of participants with colds." -- Types of Stressors That Increase Susceptibility to the Common Cold in Healthy Adults

 
dragon from sinfest
 
papertygre
 
  

2011-04-22 17:02 | Some validation for all the grumbling I do on here

http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/december/sharing-misery-research-122210.html

Stanford research shows sharing in sorrow might make us a bit happier

Stanford researchers have found that people think their peers are happier than they really are, and this distortion of reality makes people lonely and dissatisfied with life.

The researchers found that negative emotions were nearly twice as likely to occur in private compared to positive emotions and were three times more likely to be intentionally hidden from others.

Read more... )

Based on their conclusions from the study, Jordan and Monin have some suggestions for increasing happiness.

"It may be useful to remember that you aren't as alone as you think," Jordan said. "You're probably not aware of the many challenges your peers are facing."

"Paradoxically," Monin said, "if we told others how unhappy we are, we would probably all be happier in the long run."

So cry on your friends' shoulders and let them return the favor – chances are they've got some bad news to share, too. And it might do you good to hear about it.

 
dragon from sinfest
 
papertygre
 
  

2011-04-04 13:39 | 3 reasons not to give advice.

When someone tells me about a problem of theirs, my instinct is to give them some advice. Seems like the only reasonable way I could help; why else would they be talking to me? But, when I tell someone about a problem I'm having and they respond with advice, it usually makes me feel worse, sometimes annoyed. I've limped along with this contradiction as a vague mystery for some time, but a book[1] I've been reading recently shed some light on it. The following is a mishmash of ideas of my own and from the book, so don't blame the authors.

Giving advice is:

1. ...condescending. The subtext is, "I have moved beyond the problems you're having. Let me explain what to do to get to my level of functional excellence."

2. ...a hint that you don't want to hear about your friend's problems; that you either don't want to be bothered, or else that the existence of the problems makes you so uncomfortable that you want them to be solved and go away so you don't have to be confronted with them. In other words, it's a veiled rebuke to the sharer for an unwelcome act of sharing.

3. ...presumptuous, because it implies you think you understand the problem well enough to go about solving it. For example, if someone isn't getting along with their boss, suggesting that the person and their boss stay in more regular contact may misunderstand the degree of their animosity, or may ignore the fact that the person has already tried this, or may be contrary to the person's already preferred approach of finding a new job.

Sometimes, a person may really want your advice. In that case, one would suppose they would specifically ask for it. But if someone vents to you and they don't ask for your advice, then what do they want you to say? Why are they telling you? I see two related possibilities:

1. The person is confused about their experience and needs some grounding. Perhaps one contribution you could make in this case is to help articulate and identify feelings. If they tell you about failing a test, you can say "That must have been frustrating for you." You could also do some reflecting, such as "It sounds like you are disappointed because you want to be productive but you're not getting the tools you need." It is okay to make a guess because the person will probably correct you if you didn't get it right, and appreciate the attempt. The important thing to remember if you try this and they correct you is that they don't necessarily mean to contradict or discourage you. They are responding to your feedback in order to refine the picture of their internal state into one that feels right.

2. The person is feeling beat down by their experiences and needs a boost. In this case, the person wants an interaction that makes them feel loved and respected, since the problem they're dealing with is sapping self-confidence. It may seem pretty natural to them initiate an interaction out of which they want these things by bringing up what is on their minds and causing them to need this kind of interaction in the first place. It may be especially tempting in order to have the chance at an outcome where you, as their friend, have learned about the problem and yet still don't think the less of them for having it (or for having it and not having solved it yet). In this case, I would suggest caution around an attempt to make affirmative statements to boost self-esteem ("You can do it, you are the smartest person I know") because it risks sounding artificial. Just the act of listening and responding thoughtfully conveys respect and care.

In either of these cases, along with avoiding advice, also be careful with "why" questions about any feeling statement. For example, if someone says, "I hate so-and-so" and you ask, "Why?" then you are essentially questioning their choice to have that emotion, because you create the possibility that they could answer you and you might find the answer inadequate ("You're crying for THAT?") or maybe segue into advice ("Oh, you couldn't concentrate because you were up too late last night? Well, maybe you should go to bed earlier.") And anyway, most people don't immediately know why they feel a certain way. Perhaps exploring this is the reason they brought it up with you in the first place. So, your job is to give the support necessary so they can sort it out, not to be a detective or a professor.

I really think there should be some formal teaching on subjects like this.

[1] How to Talk So Kids Will Listen & Listen So Kids Will Talk

 
dragon from sinfest
 
papertygre
 
  

2011-03-29 01:23 | Seasteading in practice

I was reading a sci-fi novel recently, and started thinking about what it would take to write a novel. I further pondered that an interesting setting would be a world with seasteads. So what would this world be like? Before it occurred to me to read the official book, I brainstormed the following:

Read more... )

 
dragon from sinfest
 
papertygre
 
  

2011-03-11 17:58 | Cambridge Face Memory Test

http://www.faceblind.org/facetests/fgcfmt/fgcfmt_intro.php

Results

Out of 72 faces, you correctly identified 70.
In other words, you got 97% correct.

On our previous version of this test, the average person with normal face recognition was able to recognize about 80% of the faces. If you correctly identified less than 65% of the faces, this may indicate face recognition difficulties.

For more information about face blindness and other face recognition difficulties, please go to www.faceblind.org.

 
dragon from sinfest
 
papertygre
 
  

2011-02-24 11:33 | Made me think

"The love of power is the root of all fear."

 
dragon from sinfest
 
papertygre
 
  

2011-02-16 00:13 | (no subject)

Why Google doesn't get social and Apple doesn't get the Internet - sort of plausible.

Apparently a computer is playing on Jeopardy, and winning.

60 minutes interviews Lady Gaga. Fascinating both because of how canny she is and because of what the interviewer finds surprising.

 
dragon from sinfest
 
papertygre
 
  

2011-01-27 22:45 | Toastmasters Speech for CC #3: "Free Will"

It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishments the scroll.
I am the master of my fate:
I am the captain of my soul.

- Invictus by William Ernest Henley

Read more... )

Previous 10 }
Powered by LiveJournal.com